01 November 2016

The psychology barriers of using safety showers

Ivan Zytynski of Safety Shower People Ltd looks at the importance of - but also the taboos surrounding - the use of safety showers in manufacturing

Accidents do happen and for this reason safety showers and eye baths are essential first aid equipment in minimising the damage caused by contamination of workers with harmful materials. Showers are usually simple to operate and, as long as they have been purchased from a reputable manufacturer, will deliver the necessary amount of water at the right pressure when required. Where safety showers are installed at the appropriate location and staff trained how to use them correctly, they should offer good protection should accidental spills occur. The reality, however, is that despite following all the rules as outlined in the various standards there are still some barriers that prevent effective usage of these essential safety devices. This article explores how psychological factors can play a role in the poor usage of safety showers and explains how some product features can be used to remove those psychological barriers.

Facing up to the issues and taboos of privacy

Let’s face it, for the vast majority of people taking their clothes off in front of one’s work colleagues would not be high on their “to do list”. Indeed, a common recurring nightmare for many people would be the thought of having to undress at work or some other public place and therefore compromising their privacy. This fear of public nudity is embedded deep within our subconscious minds and the fact that there is a very strong social taboo against public nudity should not be underestimated when thinking about the psychological barriers of needing to use a safety shower.

Good practice, in the event of a chemical spill, is to remove all contaminated clothing and that really means ALL clothing. However, if someone is in absolute agony from a serious acid spill then it is likely that social taboos will be put aside fairly swiftly, but most acid spills are not that extreme, or at least do not appear to be initially. The psychological barrier to not strip down naked is strong enough to make most people not do so, even in the event of contamination with substances they know full well are very dangerous. The logical part of the brain that understands the risks and dangers is all too easily overridden by the emotional, illogical part of us. Unfortunately, failure to remove all clothing can result in substantially worsening the damage sustained by a contaminated individual.

Not wanting to be seen as a fool or disruptive

Most accidents with dangerous materials will be down to handling errors. Either the correct protective equipment was not used in the first place or some other procedure was not followed.

Everyone knows this is the case and it is inevitable that a certain amount of blame will be attached to the person who has an accident. This is particularly true of highly efficient and well run work places that have a culture that prides itself on excellence. Whilst this type of culture is excellent at preventing accidents from happening in the first place, it can sometimes create a barrier to correct action being undertaken when they do.

Furthermore, safety showers can be messy, disruptive devices. When operated they can often dump water over a nice clean laboratory onto the floor and potentially soak though to the floor below. If used, the safety shower will often cause disruption to other workers, bringing unwelcome attention to a potential error and possibly causing annoyance to co-workers and managers who will have their work disrupted. Again, this problem can be exaggerated in efficient and well run work places as well as those running on very tight manufacturing deadlines.

The perception of blame and the potential wrath or scorn of management and co-workers results in a psychological barrier to using safety equipment. If the spill seems minor then it may be strong enough for the person to try and wash out the spill in the sink or to simply remove the contaminated over garments and “soldier on”. Clearly this lack of correct procedure can be highly dangerous to the person concerned and possibly others.

One would think that with good education on the dangers posed by the various hazards and the potential risks around the work place, everyone would overcome their embarrassment put aside their personal taboo’s and follow the correct procedure. A logical thought process would be as a follows:

“Do I risk a bit of embarrassment at turning on the shower and disrupting the work of my colleagues?” Or

“Do I save myself the embarrassment but risk my long term health?”

On a logical level it’s barely a decision at all. Surely no one would choose to risk their long term health over a little embarrassment? Well no actually. In reality people will often act illogically and the social, emotional pressures often override logic completely. Sadly, humans often make very bad decisions that are against their own interests.

Life is full of such instances. Ask yourself, have you ever been too embarrassed to own up to a mistake even when you know it’s the right thing to do?

If we are honest most of us have made decisions that we know are bad due to social or other emotional pressures. Whilst we all like to think we are logical creatures, with a bit of honest introspection, we see that a lot of the time we are not.

Seeing the safety shower as non-essential

Safety showers are one of those pieces of equipment we hope are rarely used, if at all. Despite any amount of good training to the contrary staff will inevitable see that the safety shower is something that is just sitting there taking up space. Over time the perception can be that the shower is a bit of a waste of space, or worse it simply isn’t even noticed. This attitude can lead to potentially dangerous actions over time.

The space underneath a shower needs to be kept clear for obvious reasons. If the shower is viewed as essentially useless then this space may become cluttered. Matters are worse with tank showers as the enclosed nature of the shower lends itself nicely to becoming a makeshift storage area. In outdoor workplaces, the covered and sometimes enclosed nature of tank showers makes them perfect places for a cigarette or tea break, as they offer some protection from the elements.

Obviously such ad-hoc “re-purposing” of safety showers could be disastrous if an accident did happen. Not only would there be an increased risk of harm due to delays in treatment but also the litigation risk would increase as it is the employer’s responsibility to ensure the shower is accessible. An employer can, and should, ensure showers are accessible through regular inspections but sometimes, particularly on night shifts, these problems do go unnoticed.

So what can be done?

Good training is always the key to overcoming these barriers but more than that a genuine culture of safety should be adopted. By this it is meant that safety concerns are paramount within the working culture of the business so that it becomes more of a taboo to breach safety protocol than to say strip down completely when entering a safety shower. Achieving this cultural change is often very difficult and health and safety professionals struggle to do so. It is often the lofty goal that is never quite reached. So are there other more immediate, easier to achieve solutions?

Indeed there are. Rather than working to overcome deep rooted psychological barriers there are steps that can be taken to work within the constraints of these barriers. Consider the following product features that may help:

Panelled showers

It may seem a bit of a luxury to enclose a safety shower in panels to give privacy but given the above analysis it could prevent injury.

If the investment in panels means that workers will be more inclined to remove all contaminated clothing, as per procedure then it could save lives or at least reduce harm.

Catchment sumps

A catchment sump under the shower or eye bath will help prevent run-off liquid from causing disruption to other workers. If combined with side panels then all the water should be contained and so minimising the effect on others. It may well be the case that such product features are desirable due to other considerations such as contamination worries or the proximity of water sensitive equipment, but it may also be worth pausing to consider whether they may also promote the correct usage of the shower.

Platform activation

A simple solution to the “re-purposing” of showers as a storage area or a tea room is to include platform activation. With these systems as soon as any weight is placed on the panel under the shower it activates. Showers fitted with such activation systems will thus always remain clear from debris as the temptation to use them for other purposes is removed. Indeed many of the psychological barriers discussed above now act to prevent improper usage. Lets be honest, someone who gets a soaking after popping into the safety shower for a crafty fag is very unlikely to make that mistake again!

Conclusion

The key to making a health and safety policy actually work is always creating the correct culture. However, creating a culture where safety is the primary focus of all workers is often difficult. Human psychology is an odd thing and it often means that even with good, regular safety training the message is ignored. The psychological barriers and oddities of human behaviour discussed above are very real and it is a dangerous deception to think that “no one would be so silly” and thus ignore them. A little bit of thought on adding the product features highlighted above can ensure that the product “works with” the existing psychology of workers and thus creates a safer environment for all staff.

www.safetyshowerpeople.co.uk

Author
Chris Beck

Supporting Information

This material is protected by MA Business copyright
See Terms and Conditions.
One-off usage is permitted but bulk copying is not.
For multiple copies contact the sales team.

Do you have any comments about this article?

Add your comments

Name

 
Email

 
Comments
 

Your comments/feedback may be edited prior to publishing. Not all entries will be published.
Please view our Terms and Conditions before leaving a comment.

Related Articles

Engineering firm fined

An aircraft engineering firm has been fined £160,000 after two men fell around ...

Animal feed manufacturer fined

A producer of animal feeds has been hit with a £50,000 fine after a mill ...

Firm fined £6,000

A polythene film manufacturer has been fined £6,000 for safety breaches after a ...

Keeping guard

When it comes to machine safety, failure to adhere to regulations can be an ...

A death in the factory

A 23 year-old agency worker is killed after accessing a printing machine to ...

Firing on all cylinders

Neil Geldard-Williams and his team aim to take GKN’s Birmingham factory to the ...

A partnership made at the O2

Most suppliers of any product or service would like to describe their ...

Linde Safety Pilot

When it comes to operating fork lift trucks, human error is the most common ...

Work hazard display system

The Near Miss incident reporting system available from T Cards Direct is a ...

Good health & safety

Health and safety is core to the effective operation of any organisation and if ...

Save time and money!

Invest 7 ½ minutes of your time to see how you can save yourself and your ...

Employment Law SOS

David Beswick of Eversheds on return to work request for injured employees and ...

Safety at all costs

Manufacturers in breach of health and safety laws could face paying for HSE ...